Showing posts with label UFO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UFO. Show all posts

Monday, April 12, 2010

Part 3 of the UFO Abduction Phenomenon and Revelation 13

After telling us that this "beast" he saw in his vision "was like a leopard," the author John says, "but it had feet like a bear's." Revelation 13:2b.

In other words, there was something about this "beast" in John's vision which made his feet less like leopard feet and more like bear feet.

How about non-retractable claws?

Victim after victim of the Abduction Phenomenon reports that the almond-eyed Abductor has long, sharp claws for nails, not ordinary nails. Even the author of "Communion," Whitley Strieber, observes this, in his book. See P. 168, 1987 hardcover edition.

In other words, it has non-retractable claws, like a bear.

Here is the sketch of one UFOlogist, Leonard H. Stringfield, of the clawed fingers of the almond-eyed UFO occupants...

Friday, April 9, 2010

...But, Sometimes, It Is Just the Weather and People's Imagination

In Conisholme, Lincolnshire, England last year, witnesses reported seeing a brilliantly-lighted UFO attacking a wind turbine farm with tentacles, causing a turbine to lose a blade which was dropped to the ground.

Here are some eyewitness reports...

1. County councilor for the area Robert Palmer said he had seen a “round, white light that seemed to be hovering”. Mr Palmer said: “I actually saw a white light – a round, white light that seemed to be hovering. “That is the only way I can explain it – it wasn’t a flare-like light – it was just round, white light with a slight red edge to it that seemed to be over the wind turbines.”

2. John Harrison, a local witness, described how he looked out of his landing window and saw a massive ball of light with tentacles going right down to the ground over the wind farm. He said: "It was huge. With the tentacles it looked just like an octopus."

3. Witness named as ‘Shelia’ commented, ‘I’m a very light sleeper and I didn’t hear or see a thing on Sunday night,’ said the 67 year old householder, ‘I hope that one day we will see aliens, but I doubt it will happen in that field. I’ve lived here for 20 years and nothing interesting has ever happened here. Except them building the wind farm, of course.’

4. Dorothy Willows, who lives a mile and a half from the crash site, commented: “The lights were moving across the sky towards the wind farm. Then I saw a low flying object. It was skimming across the sky towards the turbines.”

5. John Harrison, a local resident described looking at the farm out of his window and seeing “a massive ball of light with tentacles going right down to the ground”.

I should add this interesting detail...

6. Ecotricity, the Stroud, England-based power provider has recovered substantial wreckage from the site including the missing turbine blade (contrary to earlier reports of it being ‘missing’ from the site) and smaller fragments.

The following was my analysis, a version of which I e-mailed to the insurance carrier for the wind farm...

When we sit in our little homes in our little towns surround by trees and fences and so forth, we have one view of the environment and weather. We think, "That's what the weather is like," and we make a second mental jump: "That's what the weather is like in all environments."

But it doesn't really work that way.

When you have a 200 foot high structure isolated on a flat ocean or flat plain, we find that things are different. Isolated high objects can generate lightning in clear weather -- even under cloudless skies!

What is happening is that when air moves the air molecules rubbing against one another "steal" one another's electrons. Imbalances in the molecules in the air masses -- weight differences, differences in "shaking" speed, or Brownian motion velocity, cause imbalances in the mass which tend to feed on themselves -- heavier molecules which have had their electrons "stolen" from them end up on the bottoms of air masses, while lighter ones with too many electrons end up on top of the air mass.

So, the bottoms of turbulent air masses tend to be "electron deprived" and therefore electron hungry.

Normally, cities full of structures making the surface irregular bleed-off these electrical differences into the air constantly, so that in cities the imbalance is chronically addressed, so that city people don't get the chance to see lightning out of a clear sky because the electricity never has a chance to build up.

But out in the country or on the sea, things are different. If we sail a 100 foot high "tall ship" out into the sea, or put a 200 foot high wind turbine out on a flat plain, we have functionally erected an enormous lightning rod.

When we do that, the static charge of air masses and the difference between them and the ground suddenly become relevant, and people begin to see a phenomenon that they never knew existed.

St. Elmo's fire -- slow static build-up in a ship out on the sea, as the ship acts like a giant lightning rod, easily visible at night; and lightning without storm clouds overhead.

I think that that is what happened at the Conisholme Wind Farm.

Weather conditions and humidity were just right, one night. The air mass above the wind turbines began to slowly develop a charge different from that of the ground, as lighter molecules bumped against and stole electrons from heavier molecules in the air mass, and then zipped-up to the top of the air mass, leaving the bottom of the mass electron hungry.

Electrons in the ground beneath the turbines, attracted by the electron-hungry air mass above them, "rushed to the rescue" They gathered in the ground beneath the turbines, and rush up the turbine towers, through the hub, into the slowly-rotating blade which happened at that moment to be highest, and therefore closest to the electrically charged air mass.

As the turbine blades turned, tens of thousands of volts of static electricity rushed out of the blades turning down, and into the blades going up.

This happens again and again and again and again. The blades get hotter and hotter where they are narrowest -- at the neck near the hub.

Inside the blades, the air is also getting hotter and hotter -- and compressed.

As the electricity builds, the towers began to glow with St. Elmo's fire. The highest blade began to develop ball lightning. Voila -- a UFO -- the ball lightning -- with "tentacles," the surrounding towers glowing with St. Elmo's fire.

The UFO looked like it was moving as the blades move slowly.

Suddenly, BOOM! -- the super-heated neck of one of the fiberglass blades couldn't take the heat anymore, and split. Superheated compressed air in the blade rushed out, launching the blade like a rocket. WHOOSH! The blade rocketed from the wind farm at hundreds of miles per hour, glowing as it flew from heat of the electricity that had passed through it, and St. Elmo's fire.

The next morning, onlookers couldn't find the missing blade -- it was in someone's back yard, a mile away. So, initial reports were that the blade was missing.

Utility workers flying a helicopter spot the blade from the air. The utility did not want the public to know that their turbines can launch turbine blades like rockets at nearby homes, so they kept it hush-hush, and dispatched a truck in the wee hours of the morning to quietly retrieve that blade and drop it off at the bottom of the tower.

The utility, happy that the public is distracted by the UFO speculation, laughed at UFO reports in the press but actually included that as a possible cause in their subsaequent public analyses.

That analysis explains it all -- the UFO, the "tentacles," the UFO seen "skimming across the sky" toward the turbines -- it was actually the missing blade flying from the destroyed turbine -- and why the blade was first reported missing, but subsequently seen in plain sight at the bottom of the tower.

Part 2 of the UFO Abduction Phenomenon and Revelation 13

The evidence that the deeply bizarre topic of UFOs and the Abduction Phenomena are religiously significant is quite large. Because of the cultural fascination with UFOs, I almost hate to discuss this concept as something of religious significance. There is a risk that contemporary religiosity -- such a fragile thing -- will be injured by the connection.

But I think that the surprising connection is there because UFOs are an evil thing, and, as I argued in a previous post, a kind of expression of mass cultural corruption and sinfulness marking the prophesied evil of the age. As I suggested, UFOs are tulpas arising from the concentration of many on sinful self-gratification, through substance abuse and pornography, which Satan's minions can occupy here on Earth.

UFOs, in other words, mark the evil of the age.

Regardless of whether that analysis is correct, here is the next connection between Revelation 13 and the Abduction Phenomenon...

"The beast I saw was like a leopard..." Revelation 13:2a.

Author Whitley Strieber reveals in his book "Communion" that the creepy-looking face on the cover of his book is a careful portrait of the image which took up residence in his mind -- when, in my opinion, he became demonically-possessed. The image had a life of its own. It responded to his thoughts.

Now, let's compare that almond-eyed UFO Abductor image with a leopard...
Initially, note that the Abductor's face is leopard like. It has the same little mouth nearly crossing a narrow chin. It has the same high cheekbones. It has almond-shape eye apertures. Both have a burnt-umber skin color.
Next, Abductors, like the leopards, tend to be night-time stalkers.

Finally, the Abductors like to lift their victims up into UFOs, just as leopards like to tree their prey.






Thursday, April 8, 2010

Does the UFO Abduction Phenomenon Fulfill Revelation 13?




In 2 Thessalonians 2, Paul says that before the world can end, something he calls "The Lawless One" must make an appearance on Earth. Paul's exact words:

1 We ask you, brothers, with regard to the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our assembling with him,
2 not to be shaken out of your minds suddenly, or to be alarmed either by a "spirit," or by an oral statement, or by a letter allegedly from us to the effect that the day of the Lord is at hand.
3 Let no one deceive you in any way. For unless the apostasy comes first and the lawless one is revealed, the one doomed to perdition,
4 who opposes and exalts himself above every so-called god and object of worship, so as to seat himself in the temple of God, claiming that he is a god[, then the world can not end] --
5 do you not recall that while I was still with you I told you these things?
6 And now you know what is restraining, that he may be revealed in his time. 2 Thessalonians 2:1-6.

The words in brackets were added by me, but the translators would agree that they complete the intended meaning of the sentence.

In a previous article in this blog (2/27/10, "Is It Possible That 'the End Is Near'?," I suggest that the other end-of-time indicators have been fulfilled...

(1) The re-establishment of Israel in 1948 = "the leafing of the fig tree," Matthew 24:30-33.

(2) The Pro-Choice Movement = "[women who SHOULD BE] pregnant" and "[mother who SHOULD BE] nursing" as to whom Jesus threatens "woe." Matthew 24:19.

(3) The U.S. Supreme Court decision legalizing sodomy, and gay marriage laws = "being like Sodom in those days," Luke 17:28-30.

(4) The Israeli nuclear program, with nuclear missile silos in Judea = "the abominable destructive thing on holy ground," which should induce those in Judea to "flee to the mountains." Matthew 24:15-16.

(5) The feminization of the clergy and the emptying of churches worldwide = Paul's "apostasy," or "great falling away." 2 Thessalonians 2:1-3.

So, question: Is Paul's prediction of the coming of the "lawless one," frequently associated with the deeply bizaree predictions of Revelation 13, coming true?

I say yes.



For now, I'll just speculate about Revelation 13:1...

1 Then I saw a beast come out of the sea with ten horns and seven heads; on its horns were ten diadems, and on its heads blasphemous name (s). Revelation 13:1.

Beginning in 1961, thousands of people began to make seemingly absurd reports of abductions onto UFOs, physical examinations, and anal and frontal rapes by aliens abducting them. In 1987, author Whitley Strieber published his break-all-records bestseller, "Communion," describing his abduction phenomenon experiences.

In that book, Strieber confesses that he didn't name his book "Comminion" -- his abductors did!

Elsewhere in this blog, I think in the ghost photo articles, I suggest that ghosts and demons in our environment of the result of a process I call "tulpaization." Intense human concentration -- such as occurs in prayer, or when people are committing attention-capturing sins -- generates these things the Tibetan Buddhists call "tulpas." Tulpas are intended by God to be the vehicles of prayer to God and of angels answering prayers. So-called "orbs" are the basic form of those vehicles.

However, if the concentration was morally ambiguous, the "orb" comes as a morally-ambiguous "ghost," and if the concentration was evil in nature, a demon occupies the "orb," and it is perceived as a malevolent ghost, or demonic presence -- or "alien."

In my opinion, the Abduction Phenomenon "aliens" are just demons occupying tulpas generated by ambient mass-evil-thinking in our society, occurring during mass sinful self-indulgence in the course of mass use of illegal drugs and in the course of mass use of pornography.

A little bit of objective proof of my admittedly bizarre contention...

Here is mystic Rudolph Steiner's early 20th century bust of one of the presiding demons, Ahriman, which he saw in the ccourse of transcendental meditation...


And now compare that guy with Strieber's Abductor portrait, on the cover of his book...


Do you see those wrinkled corneas on Ahriman's eyes, in Steiner's bust? Strieber says that as his Abductor's eyes closed, the corneas wrinkled.

Question: How did Steiner, early in the 20th century, get it right?

In any event, let's see if we can connect the cover of Strieber's knock-down drag-out worldwide best seller "Communion" with Revelation 13:1...

1 Then I saw a beast come out of the sea...

Scripture speaks at two levels, the "plaintext," or "literal," level; and the "typological" or "symbolic" level.

PLAINTEXT MEANING: The ancients of Judaism and Chistianity believe that outer space was filled with water, probably to explain rain. Proof: Genesis 1:6, where a "dome" or "firmament," separates the waters below the earth from the waters above it; 2 Peter 3:5, where it is said that the Earth was created out of water, "in" or "between" the waters -- the water above the Earth, and the water under the Earth.

An ancient one would therefore have claimed that UFOs seeming to come "from space" had come "out of the [upper] sea."

TYPOLOGICAL MEANING: In Bible typology, sea water symbolizes the "sea of damnable souls." If the Abduction Phenomenon creatures are demonic tulpas generated by mass sin, then the Abduction Phenomenon being is a beast "come out of the sea" -- a tulpa out of the sin of sinners.

...with ten horns...

PLAINTEXT MEANING AND TYPOLOGICAL MEANING: "Ten" is the type, or symbol, meaning "very much."

"Horn" is the type, or symbol, meaning "power."

So, John is saying, here, that the Abduction Phenomenon would seems to have "much power."

Lo and behold, Abduction Phenomenon abductees uniformly agree that their captors had total power over them (although there are reports that prayer disables the Abduction Phenomenon beings).

...and seven heads;...

PLAINTEXT MEANING AND TYPOLOGICAL MEANING: "Seven" is the Biblical type, or symbol, meaning "perfected," "completed," "perfectly," "completely," or "completely everywhere."

When Striber's book was first published, all over the world bookstore racks looked like this...Do you get the idea? "Heads completely everywhere," right?


...on its horns were ten diadems, and on its heads blasphemous name (s).

PLAINTEXT MEANING: Every cover of Strieber's first book on the Abduction Phenomenon features the word "Communion" literally "on" each head.

Assuming that that thing on the cover is, indeed, a demon, and assuming that they called Striber's book "Communion" to infer that people's "Communion" out to be a kidnapping, raping demon, not the Eucharist at church, that would, indeed, make "Communion" on the demon's head a "blasphemous name" literally "on" its heads.

TYPOLOGICAL MEANING: "Ten diadems" or "crowns": "very much king" -- culturally dominating?

Friday, March 5, 2010

What Are Crop Circles?


We have all seen crop circles in the news. My favorite is the "Milk Hill Monster," above.

As the media, extremely curious about the things, began to dispatch investigative reporters every time one appeared, two ale drinkers in an English pub were finally interviewed, I think by BBC. They said, "We're doing it!," and they showed the cameras their little boards with their little ropes attached. They showed how they use their little ropes to pull their little boards tight against the soles of their shoes as they stomped down swaths of stalks of whatever crop they were stomping on.

That did it for the media. Problem solved. Those mystical crop circles with their impossible complexity and perfection were the work of -- who else? -- tricky English ale drinkers and their imitators! Media brains essentially shut down after that.

Now look again at the Milk Hill Monster above. The teeny tiny dot in the center of the center circle is a person. The Milk Hill Monster was almost 1,000 feet wide -- a little short of one quarter of a mile.

A few thoughtful readers may have already realized the problem entailed by its size and complexity. Cornwall, where the Milk Hill Monster appeared overnight one night, is about 10 degrees latitude higher than where I am in New Jersey. Summer nights at 50 degrees latitude (where the Milk Hill Monster appeared on August 12) are very short -- 5 hours.

So, whoever or whatever generated the Milk Hill Monster had about 5 hours from Sunset to Sunrise to work in the dark.

Cut that down to 4 hours, to accommodate the beginning and ending twilight.

Now, look at the picture again. I read once that that is 409 circles. (You can check it, and please correct me if that number is wrong.)

And then note that there are no footsteps through the crop leading to the Monster.

That means that enough people to cut a massive and massively complex design in a crop had to get to it by walking like tight rope walkers through the tractor ruts, and then they had to do insufficient damage to the crop, when they left the ruts and walked into the area to be stomped, to generate a perfect finished product.

Even discounting what I am about to talk about, impossible.

The entire Chinese army, hanging by their toes from strings connecting them to helicopters, could not have achieved the Milk Hill Monster in one night.

They are wrong.

There are fake crop circles. Some TV shows have shown English crop circle clubs faking them.

Without exception, their multi-hour creations are paltry affairs -- little, teeny things compared to the Milk Hill Monster.

Crop circles are mystical.

Mystical what?

I'll get to that shortly.

There are sharp distinctions in detail between real crop circles and fake crop circles.

Real crop circles have unkinked stalks. In fake crop circles, the kinking damage to crop stalks is immense. Why? Because heavy people are stomping on it!

Real crop circles have no footprints in the circle areas. Fake crop circle are jammed with footprints. Why? Because one can't make a crop circle by "hanging by his toes from a helicopter"! If the crop circle is non-mystical, the maker has to walk all over the thing. It's simple!

Real crop circles tend to be braided in different ways. Fake crop circles are all braided in the same fashion, because there are only 3 ways to make them -- from the perimeter in. From the center out. Or from the middle to the perimeter and the center. You can increase complexity by playing with clockwise and counter clockwise -- but fakers can't get too complex -- otherwise, even a simple "idiot level" circle takes all 4 hours of darkness, even if created by a large team.

Again, look at the Milk Hill Monster. It appeared in one night. Fake? Or mystical?

I'll "have no truck with" (remember how the nuns used to say that?) someone who says "fake" unless they recreate the Milk Hill Monster for me on the same night of the year at the same latitude. They can use as big a budget as they want (their money -- not mine). They can use as many people as they want. But it has to be done in the dark, in one (1) night, and it has to look as good and as "footprintless" as the photo above from the same altitude. And I get to watch the work.

There will be no takers. Not even Bill Gates would try it. It's not do-able.

They're mystical.

So, who -- or what -- is doing them?

I vote "the Devil" on this one.

My ghost/UFO/demon theory is this...

Just because a non-Catholic says it, doesn't mean it's wrong. So, the Tibetan Buddhists are right: By concentration, we can create "tulpas," sometimes called "thought forms." Tulpas are shapes in the fabric of reality which God, when He created Man "in His image," gave us the power to generate. I think that there is no better explanation, technically.

Why would God have done this?

Tulpas are "positively predestined" to be "prayer vehicles." They carry our prayers to God, and they bring back the help. That doesn't mean that they have to "go" anyplace. They are somehow the "conduit," the "pipes," for the prayer-and-answer process. I think that God could have do this another way. What we look at, when we look at tulpas, are the way He simply happened to do it.

A person's prayer enters the tulpa he created by his concentration, and an angel, containing some kind of "special presence of God," travels in the tulpa back to the pray - er and his problem, and solves it.

But I use the term "positively predestined" to incorporate Church theology. Though we are all "positively predestined" to Heaven, we have the power to refuse the offer, and to bend our wills and our use of reality to walking away from God, and, ultimately, to Hell.

That includes tulpa use. Negative prayers are not just possible, but they happen all of the time. Negative prayers produce a tulpa which the Devil and his demons can jump into and make use of. People know these as pernicious "ghosts" and malevolent "presences."

The negative human thinking doesn't have to be a directed "curse" of some sort.

It can be sin, concentrated upon.

And mass dedication to sin can be as strong a "tulpa generator" as a meditator's meditation.

So, when the culture, especially via the media, successfully propagandizes a particular variety of sinful enjoyment, that tends to cause an ambience of evil which begins to spontaneously generate demonic tulpas.

It's kind of like the "dark side" of "relic - ization" of an area by leaving a relic in a place, such as a room in a home.

I believe that UFOs are demonic tulpas generated by society's evil ambience.

I believe that true crop circles are the mischief of demonically-occupied tulpas with some kind of "misdirection goal" in mind.

In a word, you are looking at what the occult calls "true magic," and what the Church rightly calls "evil."

Interestingly, I believe that today's crop circles are predicted in 2 Thessalonians 2. There Paul is discussing things to occur before the end of the world. He notes that before the end there must be some kind of significant occurrence of "signs and wonders that lie." 2 Thessalonians 2:9.

Seemingly to enlarge upon Paul's revelation in 2 Thessalonians 2, Mary, as Our Lady of LaSalette said, in LaSalette, France, in 1846, "Let the Pope beware of miracle workers, for the time has come for the most astonishing wonders to take place on the earth and in the air." In other words, bad "wonders on the earth and in the air."

Isn't it interesting how well crop circles and UFOs fit that description?